Kathering Fowle, Pacey White, Vassar and five '71 sophs hovering, Jan. 1969

Co-Education Begins:  Katherine Fowle, Pacey White, Vassar, and five ’71 sophs hovering, Baxter Hall, Williams Alumni Rev., January, 1969

Coed Exchange Classmates ’70 by College

Exchange Classmates Attending 50th Reunion, June 10-14, 2020

Vassar
Alexandra Breed

Smith
Kit Armstrong
Carolyn Hendrie
Alexandra Kimberly-Bryant (Plip)
Suzanne Reed

Williams’ decision in 1969 to admit women was one of the best the College ever made. 

The Class of ’70 was involved in the transitional “College Exchange Program.”  This led to the full admission of women in September, 1971, and the awarding of college degrees to women in June, 1971. 

Pacey White,  Vassar ’70, was one of the very first women ever to take classes at Williams. She is pictured here in January, 1969, surrounded by over-eager sophomores from ’71.  (No Class of ’70 juniors, her peers, were invited to this College “photo op.”)

She tells us of womens’ first ever semester at Williams below, and we are proud to count her among our classmates.

….

The decision to “go coed” strengthened Williams in almost every way:  the student faculty ratio increased from 10:1 to 12;1; student body size increased from 1200 to 1800 by 1975, which strengthened departments, majors, and admissions.   Compare 1970 and 2017 Williams’ admissions, departments and majors, , sports and activities, new facilities, and Williams’  standing in college rankings as one of the premier small colleges in the country.  Much of this can be attributed to the solid decision to admit women in 1969.

Going coed actually was the only reasonable decision Williams could have made. 

Princeton and Harvard already had started admitting women full-time in 1968. 

Amherst and Wesleyan also were considering going coed, and would implement the decision around the same time as Williams. 

Williams competitors in the late ’60’s were “going coed.”   Williams had to make the same decision to remain competitive for the strongest applicants in the Northeastern pubic and private schools, which were Williams’ base.

Rich Wendorf, and Paul Wickes were members of the “Student Committee on Coordinate Education,” which “worked closely with the joint faculty¬≠ trustee committee” on the admission of women to Williams.  See The Response Seems Favorable, Women Winter 1969, Alumni Review, Winter 1969.

Rich Wendorf visited “Hamilton/ Kirkland, Swarthmore, Middlebury, Harvard/Radcliffe and Brown/ Pembroke.” Women Winter 1969.

Paul Wickes helped write the joint student/faculty committee report to the “members of the Committee on Coordinate Education and the Trustee Committee on Instruction.”

 

Admitting students on a regular basis starting in 1971 increased the student/faculty ratio (a major reason for the College’s decision, see Women: The Response Seems Favorable, in Women Winter 1969, Alumni Review, Winter 1969.

With a student body increase from 1200 to 1800, allowed for more majors, departments, activities, stability, reputation, and a strong admissions pool.  See Departments and Majors, Then and Now, and Compare Admissions, Class of ’70 and 2017.

Many of the original exchange students still remain supportive of the college and for some, their Williams experience was life changing.

Degree

Five wome from Williams College 1970 Coed Exchange Program on Library Steps, Williamstown

Coed Exchange Program, 1970

Pictured here are the first five women from the 1970 Coed Exchange Program accepted as Williams degree candidates, starting in 1971:

Ellen Josephson, Political Science, Mt. Holyoke;
Joan Hertzberg, Psychology, Vassar;
Judy Allerhand, Biology, Vassar;
Gair Hemphill, Religion, Smith
Jane Gardner, English, Vassar

An introductory article on our friends was published in the Williams Alumni Review, Winter, 1970, pp. 6-7, see FirstFiveWomenCandidatesforDegrees-WmsAlumRevWinter70-RJKScan Oct 10, 17

Obviously, coeducation took hold at Williams, strengthening its size, departments and adding new majors to the curriculum.  Women are 50% of the Williams Class of 2017.   See

  • Review contemporary articles from the “Archives,” GUL Yearbook, other resources on the Coed Exchange program;
  • Review Pres. Sawyer’s Committee on Coeducation;
  • Review the College’s “democratic,” “social,” and financial reasons for “going co-ed.
  • Look for contemporary 1960’s-early 1970’s articles on the subject
    • “Everyone” i.e., Williams’ peer schools, were all doing it, so it was a matter of “keeping up w/ the peer competition” the state university systems, and “social change,”
  • Relate the Coed Exchange Program to Williams’ #1 US News rankings for the past 17 years.
    • But what’s really in the rankings?
    • Student completion rate;
    • The College’s traditional “commitment” to those it admits.